NEW HAMPSHIRE’S FASTEST GROWING ONLINE NEWSPAPER

NH AG joins fight to prevent government intrusion on lawful gun sales

Comment     Print
Related Articles
The rule seeks to require a federal firearms dealer license for every individual who sells a firearm for anything the ATF sees as a profit, including currency, exchange of another firearm, or a service. (Courtesy photo)

CONCORD - The state's Attorney General on Wednesday joined a multistate coalition of fellow attorneys general in a lawsuit opposing a new federal ATF rule that would prevent law-abiding citizens from privately selling firearms.

"This new rule represents an illegal overreach by unelected federal officials and the unlawful suppression of the private transfer of firearms by law abiding citizens. The U.S. Congress has clearly defined what it means to sell firearms in our nation and the ATF has no legal authority to change that definition," said New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella. "The rule is also a blatant violation of our constitutionally protected liberties, as Second Amendment protections have long included the rights of Americans to both acquire and sell firearms to one another in a private capacity."

The rule seeks to require a federal firearms dealer license for every individual who sells a firearm for anything the ATF sees as a profit, including currency, exchange of another firearm, or a service. It could make a felon out of a gun hobbyist who sells a firearm to another family member or a hunter who trades a firearm with a hunting partner.

"Until now, those who repetitively purchased and sold firearms as a regular course of business had to become a licensee... This rule would put innocent firearm sales between law-abiding friends and family members within reach of federal regulation," the court filing reads. "Such innocent sales between friends and family would constitute a felony if the seller did not in fact obtain a federal firearms license and perform a background check."

In the suit filed Wednesday in Arkansas, the attorneys general argue that the rule is unconstitutional, because it is vague, violates the Second Amendment, and circumvents Congress.

Read more from:
Region/State
Tags: 
None
Share: 
Comment      Print
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: